Meet the 2025 Livingston City Commission Candidates
Election season is here! Ballots were mailed off yesterday, and Election Day, November 4th is just around the corner. Voting is one of the most important actions we can take to shape our community’s future and keep our democracy strong. Our community is known for being active and engaged; let's continue that tradition this November.
To help provide perspective and allow for individuals to reach an informed decision on election day, PCEC sent a questionnaire to all seven candidates registered for the three open City Commission seats. We also extended an invitation to meet with us in person. Six candidates responded to the questionnaire, and four candidates accepted our in person invitation.
Patricia Grabow, Becky Bird, Cindy Daniels and Jessie Wilcox, thank you for making the time to visit us in person - it's great to get to know you better!
Responses below are presented, unedited, in the order in which they were received: Patricia Grabow, Joshua Congleton, Rebecca Bird, Jessica Wilcox, Cindy Daniels and Kemp O’Neill. Quentin Schwartz and Max Johansen did not provide a response. Max Johansen has withdrawn his candidacy, although you will see him on the ballot.
You can find candidate campaign links below if they were provided by the candidates.
This year voting will be done by mail-in ballot: be sure to vote and that your ballot arrives at the election office in the City County Building by 8pm November 4th.
We recommend hand delivering your ballot at the Clerk and Recorder’s office in the City County Complex - 414 E Callendar Street, Livingston, MT, 59047. This ensures it arrives in time.
If you are mailing your ballot, make sure to mail it several business days before November 4th so it is delivered by the deadline. The postmark won’t be counted.
If you have NOT received your ballot by Tuesday October 21st, go to the election office at the City County building to request one.
This year, your ballot requires the voter’s birth year below the signature, make sure you take note of this change before returning your ballot.
We hope you’ll attend the AAUW hosted candidate forum Monday, October 20th 6-8pm at the Community Room in the City County Building, 414 E Callendar St. in Livingston. There’s a remote streaming option - see more details below; and, most importantly, make sure your vote counts this November!
City Commission Candidate Responses
Click the drop down arrow on the right of each question to view the responses for all candidates.
-
Patrica Grabow
I have worked with cities for a lifetime. I was one of six who planned and literally saved Eagle River, AK over the course of a year and changed it from strip zoning to three communities. I would focus on saving Livingston's downtown part of which is designing the 20+ acres east of the wellness center into additional commercial area (smart growth) including a department store and work force housing , rather than our commercial area expanding two miles away from its core to Exit 333. Expanding our commercial area to Exit 333 could potentially destroy the five acre tracts there (much like the Suce Creek proposal.) Bozeman's 19th street and places like Belgrade was simply exceptionally poor urban planning and I want Livingston to be smarter than that and I have the skill set to make this work well . We have the Growth Policy 1600 of us participated in and now a new zoning code, which I support. I would also put our shops back to work potentially making hydrogen engines and maintenance for trains. Intelligent growth, the creation of well paying jobs and saving our historic downtown are my priorities. The city manager, thus far, has done an exceptional job in basic services---police, fire, public works. Now it it time to make the conscious choice to join the intelligence of well designed communities and use the wisdom of those who have in the past and know how to make it happen in the present.
Joshua Congleton
My campaign platform is transparency, communication, and fiscal responsibility. The city is at a crossroads, change is inevitable but we can still protect the small town charm that makes this town special, if we carefully and thoroughly consider changes when they are presented. With this change, Livingston has seen an influx of people without critical infrastructure: a grade-separated crossing, and hiring and retaining quality employees in emergency services to name a few. My priorities are not mine, per se, but rather to represent the citizens, the people who live here. As such, success in an elected role is measured by community feedback, and by listening to those comments to determine what people are liking, or not liking, regarding what decisions have been made, and adjusting future decisions, or re-reviewing previous decisions, as needed.
Rebecca Bird
I am not running to change Livingston, but to be a part of guiding change that reflects our values as a communtiy. I am a public service professional and have over 25 years of experience as a state employee , as well as working with non-profit organizations. I am a trained mediator, and I am currrenlty completing certification. I have been involved in volunteer work, and have served on several boards, at the national, state and local levels. I currently serve on the Governor's Council for Aging. I believe I am uniquely qualified to serve as a Commissioner. As I have campaigned, my perspective on goals has changed. There are many issues we face and will continue to face. My goal will be to listen and learn. My first priorty will be to assure that the city can afford to operate and that decsions made do not create undue hardship for residents. We will need to be vigilant in understanding what the implications will be when state and federal allocations to municipalites decrease. a very real possibilty given the current political times. The combination of reduced revenue and maintaining city services will be challnging at best. Measurement of succes will be understanding impact and planning for "what if."
Jessica Wilcox
I have been civically engaged in this community for nearly twenty years, and running for commission has always been part of my long-term plan to give back in a meaningful way. Public service, to me, is about listening to people, making thoughtful decisions, and helping shape the future of our community in ways that reflect our shared values.
In my first year, one of my top priorities would be to continue implementing the 2021 updated Growth Policy and begin laying the groundwork for its next update. Because this policy is intended to be refreshed every five years, it is essential to begin the process early, engaging residents and stakeholders to ensure it reflects current needs and future opportunities.
I would measure success not only by meeting key milestones in the update process, but also by the depth and diversity of community involvement. If we are able to gather broad public input, build consensus, and create a clear roadmap for responsible growth, then I would consider that a strong indicator of success in my first year.
Cindy Daniels
I’m running for the Livingston City Commission because I care deeply about the long-term well-being of our community and want to help ensure that Livingston’s growth is thoughtful, balanced, and sustainable. Livingston is the place I’ve chosen to raise my family, and I want future generations to experience the same sense of connection, safety, and small-town character that make Livingston so special.
With over twenty years of experience in public service — including military, law enforcement, non-profit development, government advocacy, and my current role as a Juvenile Probation Officer — I’ve seen firsthand how local decision-making directly impacts families, youth, and the environment we share. I’m motivated by a desire to strengthen transparency, foster collaboration, and make practical, forward-thinking choices that protect our natural resources while supporting the people who live and work here.
Livingston is at a critical juncture, and we can plan responsibly by investing in infrastructure, public safety, and community livability, while preserving the unique character and environment that define who we are as a town. My goal is to help ensure that progress and preservation go hand in hand.
My top priority in the first year would be addressing infrastructure and growth planning to ensure that Livingston develops in a thoughtful and sustainable manner. Our community is growing, but that growth must be supported by the infrastructure necessary to maintain a high quality of life — from reliable water and sewer systems to safe roads, adequate railroad crossings, and well-planned neighborhoods.
I believe in taking a proactive approach that balances development with environmental responsibility and long-term planning. By improving coordination between city departments, engaging the public early in the planning process, and seeking out grants and partnerships to fund infrastructure improvements, we can build a stronger foundation for the future while protecting the small-town character that makes Livingston unique.
Kemp O'Neill
I'm 4 generation Park County, Born and raised in Livingston. 50 years in building, contracting and developing across the state of Mt and Wy. Retired 3 years with a hometown pride.
My biggest concern is north side public safety, we need another crossing as well as looking into a north side fire and ambulance station. After a tour of our fire station and seeing our trucks and ambulances stacked in like cord wood as well as fire equipment parked outside in two different locations, being told, as well as seeing the need for a north side station.
-
Patrica Grabow
I suggested over ten years ago that we use PUD and applaud the efforts for housing development proposals like infill development. I also suppport the building of the Industrial Towel building. I also support using the second floor of downtown Livingston as mixed use including some hotel rooms like the Murray and the Grabow. They bring additional customers for our businesses downtown. I mentioned the above 20+ acres west of the wellness center as a place to build housing in accordance with smart growth, expanding from the central business district out.
Joshua Congleton
Livingston is certainly moving towards being unaffordable to those who call this town home, and who work to keep the community afloat. Houses are being snatched up for second homes, for short term rentals, otherwise being made unavailable through high rent prices, or are being picked up by people who commute out of our community to work in neighboring towns. People are unable to find sustainable housing in the community in which they work. Housing density must be carefully considered so that Livingston does not grow too big, too fast, destroying the community charm that surrounds us. Safeguards would start with being very careful and methodical in the consideration of plans involving growth, change, or development.
Rebecca Bird
The housing crisis is very real. This issue effects every level of income, every aspect of the economy, and our quality of life. The city is repsonding as best they can with the tools they are provided. The commission is currently updating zoning policies which will provide the city with much more a say in devlepoment and outcomes. Infill and density development are viable options to creating more housing. Empty or underutilized space is wasted space. Affordable housing is not substandard housing. Safe,clean, and commiunity oriented housing should be available to those who need it. I beleive zoning polcies that are clear and specific must address quality of life and are essential to family and community health and connection. Let's be creative! Should the city build workforce housing? Can there be incentives for those who are overhoused to downsize? I am willing to explore all the options, even those that are outside the box and non traditional. What can it hurt?
Jessica Wilcox
In the past, I have evaluated housing proposals through the framework of state law, local subdivision regulations, our Growth Policy, and the long-term needs of the community. For example, I voted to recommend denying the PFL proposal and also voted against granting a variance for Discovery Vista in 2022/2023. In both cases, I felt the projects did not align with the intent and direction of the Growth Policy. With the PFL request, I had concerns about whether the subdivision standards were being fully addressed, and in the case of Discovery Vista, I was concerned that granting a variance on an issue specifically discussed in the updated Growth Policy so soon after its adoption could set a poor precedent.
At the same time, I have supported projects that were consistent with our guiding plans and addressed pressing community needs. I voted to recommend approval of the North Town Apartments PUD development as well as the Sheep Mountain LIHTC project. Both of these proposals aligned with the Growth Policy, expanded housing diversity, and offered real solutions to the housing shortage affecting local workers and employers.
I believe infill and density play a critical role in responsible growth. They allow us to make efficient use of existing infrastructure, reduce sprawl, and support a vibrant community. However, safeguards must be in place to ensure that new projects respect neighborhood character, follow the Growth Policy, and include adequate infrastructure, such as roads, utilities, and public services. Balancing growth with livability is key, and I will continue to use the Growth Policy as the guide for those decisions.
I recognize the growing concern about development on the north side, and as a north side resident, I share those concerns. Without an additional railroad crossing, I worry about emergency access and egress, particularly in the event of a wildfire.
That said, I have also learned from City staff that placing a moratorium on north side development would be illegal and could expose the City to lawsuits. I am encouraged, however, that the City is keeping the idea of an overpass or additional crossing on the radar and plans to begin community listening sessions in November. This is a complex and costly project without a clear path to outside funding, so it will be important to hear how the community prioritizes this need.
For me, this is an essential conversation. The northwest side of Livingston faces the highest wildfire risk, and ensuring safe access for residents in emergencies must remain at the center of our planning.
Cindy Daniels
Livingston is experiencing a serious housing shortage that affects nearly every part of our community — from working families and young adults to seniors and essential workers. Rising housing costs, limited availability, and the conversion of long-term rentals to short-term or seasonal housing have left many residents struggling to find stable, affordable places to live.
This crisis isn’t only a housing issue. It’s also an environmental and community sustainability issue. When residents are forced to move farther away from town, it increases traffic, fuel use, and strain on our local infrastructure. It also weakens our sense of community and the local workforce that keeps Livingston running.
Infill and increased housing density should play a thoughtful role in addressing Livingston’s housing challenges. By prioritizing development within existing city boundaries, we can reduce sprawl, make more efficient use of existing infrastructure, and protect the open spaces, river corridors, and agricultural lands that define Park County’s natural character. Thoughtful infill can also support walkability, strengthen neighborhood vitality, and make public services, such as water, sewer, and emergency response, more cost-effective.
However, this type of growth must be balanced with safeguards that ensure it enhances our community without overwhelming it. These safeguards could include:
1. Requiring adequate infrastructure capacity (water, sewer, roads, and emergency services) before approving higher-density projects;
2. Encouraging mixed-income and energy-efficient housing designs that fit the surrounding neighborhood;
3. Maintaining public input and transparency in zoning and planning decisions; and
Preserving green spaces, tree canopy, and access to sunlight through thoughtful site design.
With the right safeguards, infill and density can enhance Livingston’s livability and sustainability while preserving our small-town identity.
Kemp O'Neill
Smart growth should be well planned for today and for future impacts as these decisions will cause tremendous problems without proper planning for infrastructure. The city has approved 378 lower income apartments for the workforce while taking away more single family dwelling spaces. We have a housing crisis nationwide but our State of Montana has a Housing Commission with great opportunities for funding and assistance for community and developers to assist.
-
Patrica Grabow
I have pretty much discussed this question above. I do think we need to protect the historic character of the downtown of the first rail entrance to the first national park in the world. Part of that protection is making sure that that downtown with its art galleries, restaurants and charm are protected by its Historic Preservation Commission as it has for almost 50 years now. This is essential. The place to modernize the commercial area of Livingston is the 20+ acres described above. I have also advocated for the return of rail passenger service for over 10 years now and it is getting close. If we are able, we would be the only small community along I-90 that has not been ruined. MDOT took the traffic and business coming through our downtown two miles from where it was needed. Studies show that if now the 1.9 million potential customers we could have will not turn off to come downtown. If travelers turn off at Exit 333, only 5% will come to our downtown. We also need to grow north of our central corps which means that we need an overpass now and I have studied it and an overpass coming out of Northern Lights Boulevard is 1/2 the cost of the other potential sites.
Joshua Congleton
The growth is inevitable, people want to be where the beauty is. What is important is to carefully build and plan the growth in a way that does not overshadow the small town charm that exists here. This means not pandering to the big developers, promoting amenities and infrastructure that we simply do not need, or allowing more growth than we can support. We are at a tipping point, and Livingston could very easily, and quickly, become the next casualty to growth if we do not act to stop the sprawl and unnecessary development of our beautiful landscapes.
Rebecca Bird
My vision for Livingston growth is that we find a way to honor the past and our traditions of this special place while moving forward. One question to ask is, are we a small and vibrant family town, or are we a resort community? Do we have the power to control our future, or are we destined to appease the highest bidder? The city needs to hold fast to the Growth policy, review and revise as necessary, but implement the policy with intention. The Growth policy is thorough and reflects community input. I think the greatest risk we have to maintaining the "look" and "feel" of our community is be passive and accept that we have no power or control of our future. That is just not true. Livingston is desirable. The question is, do we let "it" happen to us, or do we lead the way toward our future? I say we lead the way.
Jessica Wilcox
My vision for growth in Livingston is one that balances new opportunities with preserving the character of our community. Growth is inevitable, but it must be guided by our updated Growth Policy, the recommended land use map, and thoughtful use of existing infrastructure.
Infill should be a priority where infrastructure already exists, and large new developments must align with the Growth Policy and provide adequate services. Protecting older neighborhoods is equally important, which is why the updated zoning code is a key tool to ensure compatibility, livability, and consistency across the city.
I would also like to review and potentially update the City’s annexation policy to ensure it reflects current needs and supports responsible, planned growth. Another critical piece of our vision is incorporating active transportation opportunities—such as connected trail systems and ADA-accessible trails—to ensure equal access to outdoor recreation. Given the state’s recent regulations on parking, building safe and inclusive alternatives for getting around is more important than ever.
I believe we risk losing Livingston’s small-town character if growth happens without these guardrails. That’s why it’s essential that the Growth Policy, the zoning code, annexation framework, and active transportation planning continue to guide every major land use decision.
Cindy Daniels
Livingston's approach to growth should prioritize balance — welcoming responsible infill and new development while preserving the integrity and character of our established neighborhoods. Infill and larger developments can help address our housing needs, but clear standards, public input, and infrastructure readiness must guide them.
The City should first look inward, encouraging redevelopment within existing areas before expanding outward. This approach utilizes existing utilities and roads efficiently, helping to prevent sprawl. For large new projects, comprehensive planning and community impact reviews should ensure that water, sewer, traffic, and emergency services can support the added demand without placing undue burden on current residents.
At the same time, older neighborhoods deserve protection from abrupt or incompatible changes. Design standards, buffering, green spaces, and attention to scale and style can help maintain a neighborhood's identity. Growth should complement Livingston's historic charm — not erase it. The goal is development that adds value, strengthens community connections, and preserves the sense of place that makes Livingston unique.
Kemp O'Neill
I believe we are loosing our "small town" historic characters street by street. Smart growth needs to move at the same pace as smart preparations, crossings and first responders being in the mix before moving forward with new development are added. We need to get after our state legislatures to recognize small rural communities historical preservation in the next legislative session.
-
Patrica Grabow
If it needs fixing, fix it. If it is not broke, like most of our historic downtown and citizen built and natural parks, don't fix it. With the exception of the essential effort put into our beautiful Civic Center and paint the band shell, the city need to fix the area behind it where the land was disrupted to create the old skate park. That cement has to go and smaller parking place parallel to the river, needs to be landscaped, but not with cement---no cement in Miles/Sacajawea Park, and trees designed into the parking lot. Then the area south of undoing the damage of the old skate park, would become lawn and trees again so the farmer's market could expand into the grassy area it was before the old skate park went in. Forget the parks consultant. To me, he didn't have a clue about our citizen created parks that should be celebrated rather than altered. We also need to put up walls at the old pool and turn it into a building, rather than tear it down. Donovan Ripkema is worth reading on that subject.
Joshua Congleton
First and foremost, infrastructure relating to growth and sprawl, including water and sewer access and reliability (aging and undersized utility lines, etc), access for convenience and safety (an efficient crossing to the north side), and very simply, public services (police, fire, EMS, dispatch, public works, etc). Priority should be given to ensure safety and efficient use of the resources available first, then careful consideration should be made, with thorough thought and understanding, of how the incoming growth could impact the cost of living for those currently living here, those who move here, and the future generations as well. Community feedback should always be considered in government decisions, and priority assigned based on the needs of the community, the city, and the responsible planning for the future.
Rebecca Bird
As I mentioned in question one, this is high priority for me. Tough choices will have to be made. This issue is going to be difficult until we can get more workforce and affordable housing in the community. I'd like to see the city become much more directly involved with economic development. If we want to hold the line on taxes, we have to have more people who contribute to the tax base. As an aging community this is critical. However, this is not an overnight fix. I do believe we have some tough fiscal times ahead. I am not a doom and gloom person at all but I am practical. Keeping an eye on existing revenue streams and operating with foresight are in order.
Jessica Wilcox
Livingston faces significant infrastructure challenges, from aging water and sewer systems to the need for improved roads, sidewalks, and safe railroad crossings. These are costly projects, so the City must prioritize them based on safety, legal requirements, and long-term community impact.
Paying for them responsibly means a mix of approaches: pursuing state and federal grants, partnering with private entities where appropriate, and phasing projects so we can spread costs over time. At the same time, we must be cautious about placing too much of the burden directly on local taxpayers.
Balancing investment with affordability requires us to grow our tax base strategically, through projects that align with the Growth Policy, make efficient use of existing infrastructure, and encourage thoughtful infill and housing diversity. By supporting growth that broadens the tax base without sprawl, we can generate the revenue needed to maintain and improve infrastructure, while keeping Livingston a place where working families can still afford to live.
Cindy Daniels
Livingston’s infrastructure is under growing pressure from both aging systems and continued population growth. Our water, sewer, and stormwater systems require significant upgrades to meet current and future demand. The City also faces challenges related to road maintenance, flood mitigation, and emergency response access, all of which directly affect safety, mobility, and economic stability.
To address these issues responsibly, the City must prioritize projects based on public safety, long-term sustainability, and community impact, focusing first on essential services such as water quality, wastewater capacity, and transportation safety. Transparent planning and community engagement should guide these priorities, enabling residents to understand where resources are directed and why.
Funding should be developed strategically, utilizing a mix of state and federal grants, infrastructure loans, public–private partnerships, and careful budgeting to minimize the burden on local taxpayers. By planning and coordinating with regional partners, Livingston can strengthen its infrastructure without compromising financial responsibility or community character.
We can responsibly grow Livingston’s tax base by focusing on balanced, sustainable development that attracts new investment without displacing the residents who strengthen our community. The key is to diversify revenue and housing options, supporting small businesses, light industry, and year-round jobs while ensuring there are attainable housing choices for working families, seniors, and essential workers. As the City grows, development must contribute fairly. This means implementing impact fees and infrastructure planning that require new projects to cover the costs they generate, rather than shifting that burden onto existing residents.
Kemp O'Neill
The city"s priorities should be healthy waterlines and sewers first and not paving all streets as desired by the new community tax. Setting and staying on budget is priority.
-
Patrica Grabow
I have worked since 2016 to save the Proghorn birthing ground in front of the truck stop. At last there might be a solution I have proposed to anyone who might hear me. Help the Egelands turn their land into a conservation easement and allow for the Pronghorn, that I love, migration to occur. That might involve buying the $2.2 acres of land north of the Egleand property as well. We are the only community I know where the Proghorn give birth inside the city limits. That is amazing! I spent much of my childhood in Yellowstone and love wildlife. In addition, we have the most remarkable situation here where our young people are dedicated to the environment. That has to be expanded upon and AP classes, like the ones possible from Columbia University, should be instituted here and celebrated. I think we could have a student representative on the city council.
Joshua Congleton
Livingston is positioned in a unique place, just minutes away from many great places and ways to enjoy nature- fishing, hiking, hunting, foraging, and bird watching, just to name a few. Development should take into consideration the desires of the population, while also carefully protecting the naturescapes- visually, audibly, and in the preservation of the balance of nature. Public safety services should be a priority, and retention of our emergency responders should be seen as a long term investment in the protection of our community. This includes providing the proper training, tools, wages, and benefits to keep the talented individuals that we pay to train, but often fail to retain due to higher wages in neighboring communities. With good personnel, we will be able to better serve the community, and would be better prepared- local employees would become local experts who would support local efforts towards safety, wildfire and emergency management, and other aspects of the long term success of the city. Development must carefully be considered for their impact on the environment, economy, and infrastructure systems. Careful review and planning are a must.
Rebecca Bird
Any development should be considerate of addressing risks and vulnerabilities. Grassland fire is a huge risk for the city as we encroach on areas not traditionally in the city limits. The threat of flooding is always of concern. How does development impact public safety and protection? I believe we should be proactive in addressing the potential for hazardous threats. Like a fire drill, what's the plan? Is the plan feasible given the resources we have? How do we educate the public?
Jessica Wilcox
Livingston faces several risks and vulnerabilities, including wildfire, flooding, and the challenges of development near sensitive wildlife corridors. As a community, we need to be proactive in how we plan for and manage these risks.
The City should prioritize investments in resilience, such as fire mitigation efforts, flood preparedness and protection, and infrastructure improvements that make neighborhoods safer in emergencies. Active transportation routes and connected trails can also serve as safe evacuation corridors while benefiting residents day-to-day.
I believe it is appropriate to condition or limit development in high-risk areas. Our Growth Policy and land use map should guide these decisions, ensuring that new development does not place residents or wildlife at greater risk. Responsible planning means protecting people, property, and the environment—while maintaining the small-town character and quality of life that make Livingston unique.
Cindy Daniels
Livingston faces several climate-related risks that require forward-thinking planning. Our most significant vulnerabilities include flooding along the Yellowstone River, wildfire and smoke impacts, seasonal drought, and water supply strain. These challenges threaten our infrastructure, public health, water quality, and the long-term livability of our community.
To build resilience, the City must strengthen its stormwater and water systems, support green infrastructure, and encourage innovative, energy-efficient development. Collaboration with local, state, and federal partners will be key in securing funding for flood mitigation, wildfire preparedness, and water conservation projects.
Yes. I believe it’s both responsible and necessary to condition or limit development in areas with known high risks, such as floodplains, wildfire-prone zones, or areas with inadequate infrastructure. Protecting public safety and preventing costly future damage should be a top priority for the City.
These decisions should be made through a transparent, science-based, and community-informed process. Clear guidelines must define what constitutes high-risk areas, and developers should be required to implement mitigation measures—such as fire-wise design, flood-resistant construction, and effective stormwater management—before any projects can proceed. Thoughtful planning now prevents emergencies later.
Kemp O'Neill
Clarifying tree mitigation, Smart wildlife education, in my 65 yrs all animals have found their way into and through town yearly. Education to leave them alone and live with them is the smartest bet.
We need to have a Mental Heath services full-time 24/7 plan.
-
Patrica Grabow
i think there is nothing more important. We need to find common ground with the various political factions in our community---not extreme differences. Those coming into Livingston love our city as much as any citizen and those who were born here can celebrate her history without putting anyone down. I have spent the last 25 years here dedicated to this. For example, it cost me $11,000 to save the Shane Center.
Joshua Congleton
Collaboration is crucial to a successful government operation. Collaboration with community members is first and foremost important- our constituents (in fact, our neighbors and community members) deserve to be heard, and to have their feedback considered. It is also important to collaborate with community groups, organizations, and across governmental agencies, as this fosters an environment that allows decision makers to consider all sides of the issues at hand- and really hear what issues hold higher importance or necessity for completion. In past careers, I have worked with community resources, including food and housing authorities, drug and alcohol abuse counselors, and employment services, to help community members better themselves and their future. This kind of collaboration promotes a successful community by fostering a network of support for those involved, and therefore, fostering an environment where the community, as a whole, thrives.
Rebecca Bird
Early in my career, I was conditioned in the principles of communication, collaboration, and cooperation. To me, relationships are the backbone of good governance. There are obvious partners of course. However, I believe partnerships are not meant to be exclusive, but are meant to be inclusive of those who are interested and willing to be at the table. Throughout my career I have been an organizer of people, process and systems. I led the development of a statewide evaluation system for adult basic and literacy education programs that required the involvement of twenty three partners. As the Director of the Park County Senior Center I had was in the beginning stages of organizing the healthcare community in order to address the gap and lack of coordinated services for families dealing with Alzheimer's. However, COVID hit and that effort was lost. My experience and commitment to partnering follows me as a commissioner.
Jessica Wilcox
Collaboration and partnership are essential for addressing complex community challenges. Effective solutions rarely come from a single organization; they require coordination across agencies, sectors, and levels of government.
One example of this in practice was my work as the Park County Crisis Response Coordinator. This was a cross-sector project funded by a county grant, involving city and county law enforcement, mental health nonprofits, the hospital, EMT/Fire departments, city and county attorneys, and the county jail. I spent two years working closely with these partners to get the project off the ground, ensuring clear communication, shared goals, and coordinated implementation. Today, the program is successfully running with continued grant support and the hiring of a dedicated manager.
If elected to the Commission, I would bring the same collaborative approach to City–County partnerships—listening to stakeholders, identifying shared priorities, and building consensus to achieve solutions that benefit the entire community.
Cindy Daniels
Absolutely. Collaboration and partnership are crucial to the effectiveness of local government. No single department, organization, or elected official can address Livingston's challenges alone. Real progress happens when we bring together city staff, county leaders, state agencies, local nonprofits, schools, and residents to identify shared goals and build practical solutions.
While working with the Livingston Food Resource Center as a program coordinator for the children's and senior programs, I collaborated with the school administration to establish satellite food pantries in both the High School and Middle school. I was extremely passionate about this project after witnessing kids in our school district struggling with food insecurity.
Since becoming a juvenile probation officer for Park County, I have developed partnerships and collaborated with the Livingston School District, including teachers and school administrators, as well as many of our local nonprofit organizations that work with families. I have also had the opportunity to help develop an organization that focuses on supporting at-risk students and their families in building stability, resilience, long-term success, and offering parenting classes and mentoring.
Kemp O'Neill
I feel that NGOs and NPs that support the city community can be an important resource. They can work with our local city and county levels along with using state resources to enhance our community at a community level first.
-
Patrica Grabow
Our Growth Policy says that environment is most important, period. That has already been defined. We need to protect all of the above with protecting the water and creating wildlife corridors and highway crossings as well as preserve out five acre tracts in the county by not encroaching on them---no more annexations and no more destruction of trees. Period. We need to be more aggressive in planting them. I have define above creating environmental protection in the 20+ acres. We need to attract visitors, 85% of those going to Yellowstone are coming from the east and we get first shot at them. We need monument signage to get them to turn off at Exit 337.
Joshua Congleton
Priority for the environment should take a collaborative effort. Government should consider the desires of the community, and what values they hold, in enacting regulations on the protection of our environment. The city has the opportunity to either be a steward of nature, or to destroy it. The decisions that will tip that scale one way or another include: size and location of developments, availability and utilization of resources for reuse vs waste (i.e. recycling programs), waste and storm water management, the protection of the night sky, and in the types and sizes of buildings allowed across the community, to name a few. The people who live here, love it here, and it would be a great disservice if the local natural component of this town is not preserved and protected.
Rebecca Bird
Protecting the environment is a priority. The land, the river, the mountains are our greatest asset besides our people. The city has a responsibility to protect the land, water and wildlife. We are a wild place of nature and abundance. For me there is no hard and fast answer and I don't see it as an either or issue. The challenge is how to find the balance.
Jessica Wilcox
Yes, the City should absolutely take steps to protect our water, air, and wildlife. These resources are essential to our health, quality of life, and the character of Livingston, and they must be managed responsibly as the community grows.
Priorities should include protecting water quality, including careful management of stormwater runoff to safeguard the Yellowstone River, preserving wildlife corridors, minimizing air pollution, maintaining parks and open spaces, and supporting initiatives like Livingston Loves Trees to enhance our urban canopy. The City can play a strong role by enforcing environmental regulations, integrating conservation into planning and zoning, and encouraging development that aligns with the Growth Policy and recommended land use map.
Balancing environmental protection with growth requires thoughtful planning, allowing responsible development while ensuring that new projects do not degrade natural resources or threaten public health. By making conservation a guiding principle, we can support economic and population growth while preserving the environmental qualities that make Livingston unique.
Cindy Daniels
Yes. Protecting Livingston’s water, air, and wildlife is essential to maintaining the health, safety, and livability of our community. These are shared resources that define who we are as a town and have a direct impact on public well-being, recreation, and our local economy.
The City has a vital role in conservation because protecting our natural environment is directly tied to public health, economic stability, and community livability. Conservation isn’t about stopping growth—it’s about guiding growth responsibly so that development strengthens, rather than depletes, the resources we all depend on.
The City should lead by example through sustainable planning, land-use policies, and infrastructure decisions that protect water quality, open space, and wildlife habitat. Tools such as green infrastructure and thoughtful zoning can support both environmental and economic objectives.
When weighing environmental protection against economic growth, we must consider both the long-term costs and benefits, rather than just immediate returns. Growth that ignores environmental limits often becomes more expensive for taxpayers and less sustainable for future generations. The goal should be balance: fostering economic opportunity while preserving the clean water, air, and landscapes that make Livingston such a special place to live.
Kemp O'Neill
Solar panels, education on conserving water, again wildlife cohabitation with humans education is something that can be a city priority otherwise we have strong environmental groups that are doing great work.
-
Patrica Grabow
Most of all I love her history and 20 hotels and Depot Center which were built in five years (1903-1908) at the same time as Old Faithful Inn, Canyon Hotel (which I adored as a child) and the expansion of Lake Hotel. As a commissioner I would protect them and make sure they have the atmosphere in which they are developed though mixed use including becoming once again hotels like the Murray and Grabow. I am still personally considering applying to add Livingston as a World Heriage Site and work with Yellowstone and Xanterra to add to the potential museum, the human history of Yellowstone and its original rail entrance.
Joshua Congleton
Livingston is a small community with a great, friendly, local feel. My priorities as a commissioner would be to promote communication, transparency, and fiscal responsibility. All of these things start with listening to the community, and ensuring that the charm that surrounds us in Livingston does not go away against the will of the residents. While growth has come, and change is inevitable, it is important to weigh the desires of the community, and to protect what we have- or else we risk becoming just another high priced community, or even worse, a drive-by town.
Rebecca Bird
What I like about Livingston is the sense of community and the people. This town is down to earth and genuine. In 10-20 years I see Livingston as a community that tackled it's challenges and maintained it's sense of identity and family values. I see a community that has done the hard work of assuring that our citizens are housed, employed and safe. Livingston has seen hard times before and has proven itself to be resilient and true to itself. There will be many difficult decisions ahead. The values that will guide me are honesty, integrity, equity and fairness.
Jessica Wilcox
My favorite thing about Livingston is the strong sense of community—our small-town character, the way neighbors look out for one another, and the balance we maintain between growth and the natural beauty that surrounds us. That sense of connection shapes every decision I would make as commissioner.
Looking ahead 10–20 years, I hope to see a community that has grown thoughtfully, offering diverse housing options and robust infrastructure, while maintaining our parks, open spaces, and natural resources. It is important to me that local people can afford to stay here, that their children and grandchildren can remain in the community, and that residents can age here safely and comfortably. My decisions will be guided by values of safety, inclusivity, sustainability, and respect for the character that makes Livingston unique, even when facing difficult trade-offs.
Cindy Daniels
My favorite aspect of Livingston is the strong sense of community and connection among its residents. People come together to support one another, whether it's during a local family's hardship, a community fundraiser, or a Friday night game at Park High. Livingston embodies a small-town spirit filled with unique character, surrounded by natural beauty that reminds us every day why we should protect this wonderful place.
This spirit of connection influences how I approach decision-making. As a Commissioner, I would strive to ensure that every policy, whether related to growth, infrastructure, housing, or public safety, reflects the same balance of care and accountability. My goal is to make decisions that strengthen our sense of belonging, protect the landscapes that define us, and ensure that Livingston remains a place where families, workers, and future generations can thrive together.
The values that guide me are honesty, balance, transparency, and service to our community. Decisions must be made with integrity and open communication. My approach is to listen first, understand all perspectives, and base my choices on facts, fairness, and long-term community benefits rather than short-term gains.
Through my years in public service, I’ve learned that collaboration and accountability build trust and lead to better outcomes. Even when trade-offs are tough, I’ll always prioritize what’s right for Livingston as a whole, protecting our residents, environment, and quality of life. Every decision should reflect care for people today while also considering the needs of future generations.
Kemp O'Neill
My favorite thing about Livingston is the historic charm. The community that we all love and grew up in and learning how to balance what is coming in the future, with smart growth or enhancements. We need to be able to communicate that for any changes, moving forward and protect our National Historic Registered buildings, parks & monuments. If we lose what we have and the generations of people that do still live here, they want to continue to call this home. If we make it unaffordable or unobtainable and undesirable then we lose everything about Livingston, that we love.
-
Patrica Grabow
Tons! I have to add that, to me, PCEC, is the single most important organization bringing about intelligent growth to Livingston. I am, to say the least, a fan and, hopefully, contributing member.
Joshua Congleton
I first want to thank you for your time in putting this questionnaire together.
As a commissioner, I would promote community involvement in my decision making, achieved by listening to those who call this town home. I would work with the community to build something that we can all be proud of. Thank you.
Rebecca Bird
Thank you for the opportunity to complete this survey. As I go through this campaign I am more and more convinced that my roll as a commissioner is not to have all the answers, which I do not. My roll will be to seek out the answers, ideas and suggestions from this community of smart, caring, committed and creative souls. I am not running to represent a political party or a political agenda. I am not running with an agenda of my own. I am running because I believe we all have a voice and that everyone deserves to be heard. The best solutions come from the minds of many. Livingston has a very bright future and I hope to be a a part of guiding and leading us toward what is yet to come!
Jessica Wilcox
I would just add that my approach to serving the community is rooted in listening, collaboration, and long-term thinking. I care deeply about maintaining the character and quality of life in Livingston while planning responsibly for growth, infrastructure, and community needs. Whether it’s housing, public safety, environmental protection, or recreation, I aim to make decisions that balance immediate needs with the long-term well-being of our community, so that Livingston remains a place where people of all ages can live, work, and thrive.
I’d also like to share that I’ve been actively involved in this community for nearly 20 years—showing up, learning, asking questions, and really listening to people. I love how much our neighbors care about Livingston and how engaged everyone is in this commissioner race. Being part of this community has been a joy and a privilege, and my commitment to our town runs deep. I’m excited to see how voters respond to my candidacy, and I hope to continue serving and giving back to the place we all call home.
Cindy Daniels
Again, I bring over twenty years of experience in public service, leadership, and community advocacy. I have served as a U.S. Army Military Police Officer, a law enforcement officer, and later as the Military and Veterans Advocate for a U.S. Senator, where I worked directly on policy and constituent issues affecting families, service members, and rural communities. I worked as a mitigation specialist for the Delaware State Public Defender's Office for several years, which deepened my understanding of human behavior and relationships, the criminal justice system, and the court process. I have developed prisoner reentry programs, satellite food pantries in schools, and parenting support organizations, and I have spent years volunteering with national and local organizations. I also worked hard on my education, earning a master's degree in forensic psychology.
Today, I serve as a Juvenile Probation Officer in Park County, where I collaborate with schools, youth services, and families to build a safer and stronger community. I understand the meaning of genuinely listening to the ideas and needs of our residents. I will bring this skill to the commission along with balance, transparency, and sincere understanding. All of this education and experience has equipped me with the tools and skills necessary to be a valuable asset to the City Commission.
Kemp O'Neill
If it is not broke don"t fix it and Livingston is not broke yet.
American Association of University Women Candidate Forum
The American Association of University Women, Park Branch, will hold a candidates forum on Monday, October 20th for City Judge and City Commissioner in the Community Room of the City-County Building, located at 414 E. Callender St. in Livingston.
The audience will have the opportunity to submit written questions.
6-6:30pm: City Judge Candidates, Carol Merideth and Belinda Schweigert
6:35-8pm: City Commission Candidates Rebecca Bird, Joshua Congleton, Cindy Daniels, Patricia Grabow, Kemp O’Neill, Quentin Schwarz and Jessica Wilcox from 6:35 to 8 pm.
To stream the forum: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85673424903?pwd=J99r4O7gmo5md6MkRMh1vlJI0Z1Q2V.1 meeting ID: 856 7342 4903 and passcode: 206524